Actual Communists and their glaring errors

This Communist (talbano@peoplesworld.org) tries to write a coherent story about the Judy Ancel violence videos, and fails.

[Insert Janeane Garafalo joke here] What's the over-under on how many cats this woman owns? Your IV team says greater than 30, anyone willing to say less? Also, how many accents do you think she manages to squeeze into Teresa? At least two...

Let's just start with the easy stuff:

1. Youtube has not taken down the videos.

2. There has been no one who said the intended context of Judy Ancel's remarks were "the exact opposite." At best, detractors have claimed that it was a "pedagogical explanation" to use her words. That they were the opposite is incorrect.

3. The only source for "debunking" the videos has been Media Matters. We have responded to their supposed "debunking" as well. However, to claim that "multiple sources" have done so is inaccurate.

4. UMKC did not "immediately" view the tapes and defend Ms. Ancel. They claim they are still investigating. As there are 30+ hours, that seems appropriate. 

Is she incapable of writing a decent story because:
1. She works in journalism (most likely)
2. She has 32 cats and they distracted her (possible)
3. She's a union member and, thus, lazy (possible but unlikely the sole cause)
4. She's a Communist and believes that only violent revolution will bring about utopia (true but inapplicable here)
5.She's really a soft Democrat and views this as a partisan issue (also true, but probably inapplicable here)

Perhaps you have a different opinion, let us know in the comments or by email:
blog@insurgentvisuals.com